1440p 240Hz monitors are a great way to get a competitive advantage in eSports titles without sacrificing resolution. Sure, 4K is crisper but it also requires a beastly GPU to reach the max refresh rate of high-end 4K monitors. Further, as of recently, you aren’t limited to TN panels since we’ve received a couple of 1440p 240Hz IPS monitors that come with great image quality. And let’s not forget the Samsung Odyssey G7 that, despite featuring a VA panel, has excellent colors, incredible motion clarity, and a bunch of extra features. But which are the best 1440p 240Hz monitors? Find out below.
Before we start, do note that this category doesn’t include any proper budget model. Combining 1440p resolution and 240Hz refresh rate is still quite an expensive endeavor for manufacturers and we’ll have to wait a bit before we see a proper budget monitor in this category. The closest to a budget 1440p 240Hz monitor is the HP Omen X27. Also, remember that all IPS panels show some extent of IPS glow. Finally, if you have a noticeable backlight bleed, don’t return the monitor right away. Use it for a couple of weeks and allow the panel to breathe and for the pressure between the layers to ease. If the issue persists after a couple of weeks, it’s time for a replacement. Okay, let’s begin.
Best 1440p 240Hz Monitors - Our Picks
| Award | Model | |
|---|---|---|
| Best Overall 1440p 240Hz Monitor | Acer Predator XB273U |  |
| Acer Nitro XV272U |  |
|
| Best Curved 1440p 240Hz Monitor | Samsung Odyssey G7 |  |
| Best TN 1440p 240Hz Monitor | HP Omen X27 |  |
| Best Alternative To Predator XB3 | Alienware AW2721D |  |
| 1440P 240Hz IPS Honorable Mention | Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q-X |  |
| Best 1440p 240Hz Ultrawide Monitor | Samsung Odyssey G9 |  |
| Best 1080p 240Hz Alternative | BenQ Zowie XL2546K |  |
Best Overall 1440p 240Hz Monitor
Our top choice is a monitor duo from Acer, the Predator XB273U (also known simply as the XB3) and Nitro XV272U. First of all, we’ve picked these two because they’re basically the same model (there’s some difference in design and port selection) so you’ll have an easier time finding them in stock compared to the other two 1440p 240Hz IPS models on this list. Next, the Predator XB3 is also available in a 32-inch format, for those who want a larger monitor but don’t like the curved form factor of the Odyssey G7 from Samsung.
Acer Predator XB273U
| Size | 27” |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync |
| I/O Ports | 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 |
Acer Nitro XV272U
| Size | 27” |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync |
| I/O Ports | 2 × HDMI 1 × DisplayPort 5 × USB 3.0 |
When it comes to performance, the Acer has excellent response time, but only if you plan on playing games in the range between 144Hz and 240Hz. In 60Hz mode, response time is far from perfect. So, if you’re playing demanding single-player titles, pick a different model. The Alienware AW2721D and the Odyssey G7, for instance, are excellent across the board, with a pretty solid performance in the 60-120Hz range. HDR is of the basic tier (HDR400) and it’s not great, but that’s the case on the majority of PC monitors. Not a major downside, if you ask us. Both models support FreeSync premium and are G-Sync compatible.
The colors are excellent after you calibrate the monitor. That said, while the accuracy out of the box is a bit off, colors look fairly good for regular use. The monitor also supports 10 bit color@240Hz. If you want to do some photo and video editing work, definitely calibrate the monitor. Finally, the Acer has the sRGB mode meaning the colors won’t look oversaturated due to its wide color gamut, like on the Alienware.
As for the brightness, it’s pretty good (almost 500 nits) and the contrast is average for an IPS panel (about 850:1). Overall, the duo from Acer is an excellent choice for esports gamers who can run their games between 144Hz and 240Hz. Gamers who prefer AAA single-player titles should think about getting a different model due to the poor response time in the 60-120Hz range.
Best Curved 1440p 240Hz Monitor
Samsung Odyssey G7
| Size | 27” |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync, G-Sync |
| I/O Ports | 1 × HDMI 2 × DisplayPort |
The Odyssey G7 from Samsung is one of the best gaming monitors on the market, despite a flurry of issues reported by users. Flickering issues have been resolved with a firmware update but there’s still a chance you’ll get a unit with other issues. That said, most PC monitors these days (including all three IPS picks) suffer from relatively poor QC. Purchasing any model featured on this list also includes an involuntary panel lottery entry.
G7 has superb performance across the board. Response time is unbelievable for a VA panel, and the monitor doesn’t suffer from poor response times when gaming at lower refresh rates (60-120Hz). Colors are great and accurate, gamut coverage is tiny bit behind our IPS picks, out-of-the-box accuracy is more than decent, and contrast is superior compared to every other monitor on this list, sans the Odyssey G9.
Max brightness is about 600 nits, with HDR performance being better than on most other 1440p, 240Hz models. The G7 also supports FreeSync and is G-Sync compatible. Another good thing about this model is that it’s available both in 27 and 32-inch versions. The only major downside compared to the IPS panels are narrow viewing angles. Now, the extreme curvature of the panel will be a huge downside for some users but if you don’t mind it, this is an excellent choice. Especially if you play games in the 60-144Hz range.
Best TN 1440p 240Hz Monitor
HP Omen X27
| Size | 27” |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | TN |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync |
| I/O Ports | 1 × HDMI 1 × DisplayPort 3 × USB 3.0 |
When it comes to the TN 1440p 240Hz monitors, the best one is the HP Omen X27. It has excellent colors for a TN display, covering 100 percent for the sRGB color spectrum and about 75 percent of the DCI P3 spectrum. Great for gaming, solid for content creation. The contrast is average, hovering around 800:1. Max brightness is about 300 nits for both SDR and HDR. Not great but bright enough for well-lit rooms.
Response time is excellent across the board, especially when playing in the 60-144Hz range. The Omen X27 is FreeSync and G-Sync compatible. As for the downsides, ergonomics aren’t great, color performance is behind most other picks, and viewing angles are below par. This is normal for a TN panel but still, it’s behind our other picks. The good news is that, while the Omen X27 isn’t a proper budget model, it’s the closest you’ll find to a budget 1440p 240Hz monitor.
Overall, this is a great high refresh rate gaming monitor. The inclusion of a TN panel hurts it when compared to both IPS displays and the G7 and G9 models that use a VA panel but for gaming, this is a pretty solid choice. As for the alternatives, there’s the Lenovo Legion y27gq-25 that has higher brightness and better response times but that’s also extremely expensive for a TN monitor. Instead of Lenovo, just get one of the IPS monitors on this list or the Odyssey G7.
Best Alternative To Predator XB3
Alienware AW2721D
| Size | 27” |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Ultimate |
| I/O Ports | 2 × HDMI 1 × DisplayPort |
The Alienware AW2721D is another member of the 1440p 240Hz IPS family of monitors. This one comes with great response times across the board, a wide color gamut with accurate and lively colors, and G-Sync ultimate branding. That means the inclusion of a hardware G-Sync module and a fan on the back, that isn’t too loud mind you.
Do note that this monitor does not come with the sRGB display mode meaning colors will be oversaturated when watching most media content as well as when playing games in SDR. Also, the 10-bit color is only supported in the 144Hz mode. At 240Hz you get 8-bit color due to the lack of the DSC feature. The contrast ratio is very close to 1000:1. In other words, decent and in line with most other IPS monitors.
HDR performance is solid for a PC monitor, with the HDR600 spec, 32 local dimming zones, and max HDR brightness of 750 nits. Max SDR brightness is higher than 500 nits, which is an excellent result. Design is a subjective thing but for us, this is a slick-looking monitor. In fact, the Alienware looks better than most other models on this list. Overall, this is a very capable gaming monitor and it should be on your shortlist if you don’t mind oversaturated colors.
1440P 240Hz IPS Honorable Mention
Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q-X
| Size | 27” |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync |
| I/O Ports | 2 × HDMI 1 × DisplayPort 2 × USB 3.0 |
The Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q-X is a pretty good 1440p 240Hz gaming monitor but we had to put one IPS model as an honorable mention. In other words, while not the best of the three, this is still an excellent choice if you can’t find one of the other three (technically four) models shown on this list.
Response time is excellent in the 144-240Hz range but, as is the case with the two Acer monitors, do not buy this one if you plan on playing demanding single-player titles that run in the 60-120Hz range. If you’re mostly a single-player type of gamer, get the Alienware or the Odyssey G7. They both have excellent response times across the board.
When it comes to color performance, it’s great. In line with other IPS panels and the G7 and G9. It’s great for gaming and good enough for content creation. You also get the clamped sRGB mode. On the flipside the panel is BGR instead of RGB, meaning text won’t be as crisp as on RGB panels. Also, the monitor doesn’t support true 10 bit color@240Hz, only 8-bit.
Max brightness is pretty good at about 440 nits, with the contrast hovering around 1000:1 value. In other words, pretty average contrast, in line with other IPS displays in combination with great maximum brightness. Finally, the design is great until you see the back of the monitor. But since you’re mostly looking at the actual display, we don’t mind it. Overall, the Aorus FI27Q-X is another strong contender in the 1440p 240Hz IPS market. We don’t recommend it for users who prefer playing single-player games at lower refresh rates but everyone else should definitely consider purchasing it.
Best 1440p 240Hz Ultrawide Monitor
Samsung Odyssey G9
| Size | 49” |
| Resolution | 5120 × 1440 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | VA |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync, G-Sync |
| I/O Ports | 1 × HDMI 2 × DisplayPort 2 × USB 3.0 |
In short, the Odyssey G9 is a super ultrawide version of the Odyssey G7. The monitor has excellent colors, great response times across the board, FreeSync and G-Sync support, as well as great contrast and colors. It’s not for everyone and it’s quite expensive but if you want a 1440p 240Hz ultrawide this is the only monitor that ticks all boxes, even though it’s not a regular, 21:9 ultrawide. Oh, and due to the quite demanding resolution, we recommend pairing this monitor with the RTX 3080 or the RX 6800 XT.
If you want a 21:9 ultrawide with the same specs, there isn’t any. The closest you can get to 240Hz is with the latest Predator X35 from Acer. This model features 3440×1440 resolution and can go up to 200Hz. If you ask us, close enough unless you’re a pro esports gamer. But in that case, you probably aren’t looking for an ultrawide. Regular gamers won’t notice the difference. The only downside is its extremely high price. For the money, you can get both the G9 and the G7 and still have some cash left.
Best 1080p 240Hz Alternative
BenQ Zowie XL2546K
| Size | 24.5” |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 |
| Pixel Density | 90 PPI |
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms |
| Panel Type | TN |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium |
| I/O Ports | 3 × HDMI 1 × DisplayPort |
If you’re a regular gamer who wants a 1440p 240Hz monitor but don’t want to pay the premium price, just get one of the many 1440p 165Hz models. You won’t notice the difference when gaming, even when playing esports titles. But if you’re a semi-pro esports player in need of a relatively affordable 240Hz monitor but don’t have the money for a 1440p model, get the BenQ Zowie XL2546K.
This monitor has insanely low response times with ULMB (called DyAC+ here), surprisingly good color performance (it’s a TN panel after all), and great ergonomy. The most important thing here is the image clarity. The DyAC+ tech is seriously capable, offering unmatched image clarity with virtually zero blur.
The downside is that, like with many other monitors, you cannot use ULMB in combination with VRR but if you’re playing esports titles chances are you won’t notice screen tearing when running games in 240fps. For single-player titles (if you play any) just turn off the DyAC+ setting.
